The
connections between intellectual property and public health are often
not obvious. The pharmaceutical industry naturally is dependent on
intellectual property rights to assist it in recouping massive
investments for the research and development needed to create
much-needed new drugs. However, intellectual property
enforcement is also crucial in the fight against counterfeit medicines
currently prevalent in the developing world. Biotechnology
companies also use intellectual property laws to protect the endeavors
of their research without which such companies would be unable to even
begin the process of attracting investment funds.
West Africa and
Intellectual Property: Policy Priorities to Foster Economic Growth, Public Health and
Culture
December 6-8, 2004
Sofitel Teranga Dakar
Dakar, Senegal
Many West African countries do not have strong intellectual property regimes and are
having difficulty in enforcing intellectual property rights. Combating piracy and
counterfeiting is a major problem for these countries. Not only does piracy and
counterfeiting drastically reduce the economic potential of local intellectual
property-based industries, but it also can have serious public health and safety impacts,
when for instance pharmaceutical products are counterfeited. This conference will bring
together policymakers, legal professionals and the public health community to discuss the
rule of law in intellectual property, intellectual property public health and safety,
technology commercialization and the use of intellectual property to promote culture based
industries.
Agenda
Press Release
Jordan Intellectual Property Week -
2004
Amman, Jordan
August 23 - 25, 2004
Jordan Intellectual Property Week is an
annual event that brings together international experts and a host of Jordanian business
and government leaders to discuss a intellectual property business strategies and
policies. With the patronage of Jordan's King Abdullah, Jordan IP Week is the
largest intellectual property event in Jordan. Among the topics discussed at Jordan
IP Week 2004 include, comparative patent claim scope for pharmaceutical products,
effective adjudication of copyright and trademark cases, national innovation policy
reform, negotiating franchising agreements, and patent search techniques.
Agenda, Biographies and Selected
Presentations
Press Release
Jordan IP Week Website
IIPI Report: Establishing
Globally-Competitive Pharmaceutical and Bio-Medical Technology Industries in Jordan -
Assessment of Business Strategies and the Enabling Environment
By: Michael Ryan and
Jillian Shanebrook
August 2004
The government of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan has pursued during recent years an
ambitious economic reform effort related to accession to the World Trade Organization and
conclusion of a bilateral free trade agreement with the United States. Jordan, though
modest in economic size and population, is strategically vital to the Middle East region
and economy, as the establishment of the permanent home of the World Economic
ForumMiddle East at the Dead Sea testifies. Future economic success will depend in
part on Jordans capacity to foster globally-competitive pharmaceutical and
bio-medical technology industries in Jordan. The researchers investigated global and local
industry sector dynamics and change, especially with respect to pharmaceuticals,
bio-medical technology, and medical tourism. Secondarily and with a focus on conditions
for industry success, the investigators obtained industry perspectives on the enabling
environment of government laws, policies, and public administration structures and
processes, especially with respect to intellectual property and bio-medical regulation.
From the perspectives of industrial organization economics, law and economics, and
technology management, and informed by the most up-to-date general research findings and
global best practices, the report recommends strategies for business, government, and the
research community.
Report (PDF, 691KB)
Press Release
An Intellectual Property System in Thailand for Bio-Innovation and Commercialization: A
National Strategy for Business, Government and the Technology Community
By: Michael Ryan and Eric Garduño
July 2004
Thailand is in the midst of developing a national biotechnology strategy designed to
promote the growth of its nascent biotechnology industry. This report its meant to inform
the development of this strategy, by providing a number of specific intellectual
property-related recommendations.
Report (PDF, 85KB)
Press Release
Protecting Pharmaceutical Patent Rights
Into the Future
Speech by Hon. Bruce Lehman
Paris, France
June 24, 2004
During the 1970s there were great investments, both public and private, into
technology but little was done to translate these into the international market place,
when the 1980s and the American Malaise hit many industries suffered in
terms of what they could invoke patent protection over. This resulted in a strengthening
of patent laws under President Reagan which in turn spawned Silicon Valley and a major
take off of technological advances.
Speech (PDF, 33KB)
Is a Sui Generis System Necessary?
-Benefit Sharing Agreements
Speech by Lee Gillespie-White
New York, NY
January 14, 2004
With WIPO and the WTO drawing up agreements to deal with the protection of biodiversity it
becomes necessary to ask if, with in that agreement, there needs to be protections for
genetic resources and the technologies that could emerge from them. Traditional knowledge,
with respect to medical technology, has always been protected and respected, however when
patents run out on inventions built off this knowledge they become public domain sometimes
taking the knowledge with them.
Speech (PDF, 167KB)
Conference on Intellectual Property and International Public Health
October 6-8, 2003
Georgetown University
Washington, DC
New drug development takes place almost entirely in the United States, the member states
of the European Union and other developed countries. While governments of these developed
countries provide significant public funding for basic research into the causes of
disease, most pharmaceutical products result from the research and development efforts of
private companies. The new drugs developed by pharmaceutical companies are, in almost all
cases, patented in the major markets where they are distributed commercially. In the
United States, pursuant to the Bayh-Dole Act, even taxpayer-funded research carried out in
university and government laboratories is patented, and the patent rights are routinely
transferred to profit-making pharmaceutical companies who obtain marketing approval and
make them available to patients. This conference will explore the relationship of
the patent system to new drug development, the relationship of patents to the pricing of
new drugs, the differences in the markets for patented drugs among developed countries,
the relationship of publicly funded research to new drug development, possible solutions
to the problem of providing drugs to patients in poor countries, and the role of patents
in research directed at medicines needed in developing countries. Presentations will
be made by experts from academia, government, and the private sector. Invitations to
attend the conference will be extended to policy makers, public health authorities,
business people, and experts in intellectual property law from throughout the world, with
a special emphasis on participants from developing countries.
Agenda, Biographies and Materials
Conference Overview
Press Release
IIPI Report: Counterfeit Goods and the Publics Health and Safety
By: Michele Forzley
July 2003
Counterfeit goods cause injuries in many ways. From forged labels on baby formula to drugs
that lack active ingredients, the counterfeiting of alcohol, drugs, food, and personal
care items endanger the publics health and safety.
Counterfeiting is a problem for both the intellectual property legal system and for public
health and safety organizations around the world. This study systematically reviews
available materials and begins the scientific study of counterfeit goods as an
unintentional injury mechanism.
Report (PDF, 261KB)
Press Release
Making the World Safe for Biotech Patents
Article
by Hon. Bruce Lehman
2003
The Journal of Biolaw and Business
Intellectual Property’s
Golden Age is over. Now, hard-fought international reforms in
intellectual property standards face a menacing backlash by
anti-biotechnology activists. Ironically, most of the backlash is not in
developing countries, who have widely accepted intellectual property as
a tool of development, but in developed regions such as the European
Union and Canada.
Article (PDF, 553KB)
Access to HIV/AIDS Pharmaceuticals and the
Issue of Rights
Speech by Lee Gillespie-White
Washington, DC
November 2002
By not enforcing patent barriers on HIV/AIDS medicines in sub-Saharan Africa patents have
the ability to access them easier, much to their benefit. However, deciding when and where
to use the drugs becomes a socio-economic issue rather then a health care issue adding to
the problem.
Speech (PDF, 164KB)
Health and Patents: The Rights Issue
Speech by Lee Gillespie-White
New York City, New York
June 2002
The question of access to drugs
is normally dealt with as a trade off between
competing rights- the right to health care versus the right to property. It becomes
necessary to weigh the benefit of a drug against the rights of the company that made it
for profits, and in developing nations this question becomes even more vital.
Speech (PDF, 150KB)
Patents and Health
Speech by Hon. Bruce Lehman
Beijing, China
May 2002
Due to the way that patent protections operate it is generally impossible for people in
developing countries to purchase goods that contain still protected technologies, this
includes everything from flat screen televisions to medicines. Many developing countries
simply do not apply patens to medicines, however WTO has upheld that they can do so until
2016. Due to this many pharmaceutical companies do not devote much research to drugs for
the developing world, causing even more disease and poverty.
Speech (PDF, 474KB)
Treading an Independent Course for Protecting Traditional Knowledge
by Lee Gillespie-White & Eric Garduño
April 2002
Taking a traditional
natural product of the Sans Tribe, South Africa's Council for Scientific
and Industrial Research (CSIR) developed an effective hunger suppression
supplement. However, what initially was a case of bio-piracy was
converted into a shinning example of equitable benefit sharing with
indigenous people.
View Article (99 KB)
What Did Doha Accomplish? The Doha Declaration on Intellectual Property
Rights and Access to Medicines
by Lee Gillespie-White
November 2001
After the “Doha
Declaration on Intellectual Property and Access to Medicines,” advocates
of increasing third world access to life-saving medicines claimed
victory, but what did they really win?
View Article (98 KB)
Article: Do Patents for Antiretroviral Drugs Constrain Access to AIDS Treatment
in Africa?
By: Lee Gillespie-White and Amir Attaran
October 17, 2001
Published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) and co-authored by
IIPI's Lee Gillespie-White and Dr. Amir Attaran of Harvard's Center for International
Development, this article illustrates the fact that patent protection does not act as a
barrier to access to HIV/AIDS pharmaceuticals.
Article (PDF,
512KB)
Press Release
Briefing to Congress on the HIV/AIDS Pandemic
July 20, 2001
Washington, DC
The International Intellectual Property Institute has been involved in research and
discussion of the HIV/AIDS issue since its founding in 1998. In December 2000, IIPI
published Patent Protection and Access to HIV/AIDS Pharmaceuticals in sub-Saharan Africa,
a first-of-its-kind report examining the patent status of HIV/AIDS treatments in all
countries of sub-Saharan Africa . As part of its efforts to promote access to HIV/AIDS
medications to people in developing countries, IIPI worked in conjunction with the
Congressional Economic Leadership Institute (CELI), to create a briefing for Members of
Congress and Congressional staff concerning the role of the U.S. government in the
HIV/AIDS pandemic. The half-day program was co-chaired by Congressmen Jim Kolbe (R-AZ) and
Jim McDermott (D-WA) and featured several renowned experts on the crisis. Four separate
panels examined the status of the crisis, the state of related science, approaches to
intervention and prevention, care and treatment, and discussed how the resources and
leadership of the U.S. government can be used most effectively.
Agenda, Biographies and Materials
Press Release
Who Owns the Human Genome? Human
Genetics and Intellectual Property
Speech by Hon. Bruce Lehman
Washington, D.C.
April 2001
The Supreme Court ruled in Diamond vs. Diehr that anything created under the sun
that is made by man was eligible for a patent. This should clearly apply to
discoveries made concerning the application and use of gene technology.
Speech (PDF, 130KB)
Panel Discussion Series: Where
Intellectual Property and International Trade Collide
January 2001 - March 2001
Ronald Reagan International Trade Center
Washington, DC
International trade in goods and services that are protected by intellectual property laws
has significantly increased in volume and value over the last ten years, drawing the
attention of trade experts and policy makers around the world. As part of the Institute's
public education effort concerning the importance of intellectual property to the world
economy, this discussion series provided an overview of intellectual property law, United
States trade law related to intellectual property, and international institutions that
deal with intellectual property matters. The discussion series also provided focused
examination of such important issues as parallel imports and pharmaceuticals, the status
of Chinese intellectual property protections leading up to World Trade Organization entry
and North-South differences in intellectual property protection.
Overview and Agendas
Press Release
IIPI Report: Patent Protection and
Access to HIV/AIDS Pharmaceuticals in Sub-Saharan Africa
By: Lee Gillespie-White, Paul Salmon
December 2000
This groundbreaking report investigated the patent status of HIV/AIDS medications in
Sub-Saharan Africa. While patents, and intellectual property in general, are often cited
as barriers to people receiving medications, this report and subsequent research shows
that the patent status of medications is rarely an issue, and that financing and poor
infrastructure are the primary impediments to people receiving the necessary drugs.
Report (PDF, 8.7MB)
Press Release
Panel Discussion: Fairness in Drug Patenting: The Role of Congress
Summer 1999
Washington, DC
The pharmaceutical approval process is long and tedious, usually representing a
substantial portion of total research and development costs. Often, much of the original
20-year patent term applied to pharmaceutical products lapses before final approval is
obtained, reducing the period of time companies have to recover expenses. To safeguard the
incentive for pharmaceutical companies to continue researching and developing new
products, intellectual property laws should take into consideration the realities of the
pharmaceutical approval process. This discussion brings together a number of experts to
discuss a fair means of granting patent term restoration.
Panel Overview
Statement
Before House Subcommittee re: Act Hon. Bruce Lehman (PDF, 103KB)
|
|
|